sample objections to interrogatories florida

endobj /P 321 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /K [2] /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /StructParents 20 << /Type /StructElem << Fla. R. Civ. /K [9] /P 10 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /Pg 24 0 R /CreationDate (D:20180621145354-05'00') /Type /StructElem Aninterrogatory is not objectionable becausean answer to it involves an opinion or con-tention that relates to fact or the applica-tion of law to fact, or would be based oninformation obtained or legal theories de-veloped in anticipation of litigation or inpreparation of trial." /S /P /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem endobj 32 0 obj >> >> /S /P /StructParents 18 /S /P >> endobj << /Pg 17 0 R /P 10 0 R 196 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R << /Resources 433 0 R /Count 22 endobj >> /K [460 0 R] >> 122 0 obj /S /P /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P /Type /Page >> 77 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R endobj << H|WrH}+2b^JZ0m4*@Bb$aaRy/6)|JSH;VC$r74jBX5r m.IN-n_xUu f?#JS !CA|?~azV^bme. /S /P >> 1, March 2018, Responding to Social Media Discovery Objections. /Pg 33 0 R /S /P >> /K [10] endobj << Rule 12.340 - INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES, Fla. Fam. Law. R - Casetext endobj /S /P /Type /StructElem << /Resources 353 0 R /Contents [370 0 R 371 0 R 372 0 R] endobj /K [12] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Resources 428 0 R << /Type /StructElem 0000052510 00000 n << And social medias footprint is ever-expandingas of the third quarter of 2017, Facebook had more than 2 billion monthly active users, up from 1 billion in 2012. uuid:39348FAF-56C1-45B6-9267-1F93B3F12615uuid:39348FAF-56C1-45B6-9267-1F93B3F12615 /S /LBody /Type /StructElem 166 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj A claim of privilege must be supported by a statement of particulars sufficient to enable the Court to assess its validity. /Pg 28 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj Importantly, the Fourth District only contemplated still images in Nucci because they were the subject of the discovery dispute. /K [11] /P 10 0 R endobj /P 472 0 R 46 0 obj 0 /P 464 0 R endobj 261 0 obj /S /P /Pg 22 0 R << << The court may allow a shorter or longer time. /S /P endobj /S /P qWgm%^yv&r8B41. endstream endobj startxref /K [31] >> endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << /S /P << /Pg 30 0 R /Group 424 0 R /K [5] /S /P /K [5] /Length 12 0 R /Type /Page In 1994, the Trial Lawyers Section of The Florida Bar, the Conference of Circuit Judges, and the Conference of County Court Judges formed a joint committee to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas on how to improve the day- to-day practice of law for trial lawyers and trial judges. >> 274 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [5] /S /P << 162 0 obj /Tabs /S 0000003211 00000 n /IDTree 9 0 R /K [3] /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R /P 471 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /K [37] endobj << /K [32] 199 0 obj 211 0 obj >> << >> << /Pg 27 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R 142 0 obj 80 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R 163 0 obj >> /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 21 0 R << /S /P FORM INTERROGATORY NO. 61 0 obj 86 0 obj 0000051500 00000 n /S /L endobj /P 10 0 R 248 0 obj /K [2] /Contents [395 0 R 396 0 R 397 0 R] /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem >> << For reprints, contacttamontemuro@mdwcg.com. /Filter /FlateDecode endobj 262 0 obj /S /P /K [5] /P 10 0 R 127 0 obj 28 0 obj /Contents [355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R] 326 0 obj /Pg 21 0 R >> /S /P /ITXT (2.1.7) /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem << 52 0 obj << endobj <> /S /P << When photographs seemingly disappeared after the plaintiffs deposition, the defendant moved to compel inspection of the plaintiffs Facebook profile. /Pg 14 0 R << /S /P P. 1.280(b); Fla. R. Civ. /A 439 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P /Resources 413 0 R >> 89 0 obj /Pg 14 0 R For authorities updated in real time, please see the SmartRules Guide for the litigation document you are drafting. /Type /StructElem /K [32] 152 0 obj /Type /StructElem << /Annots [] >> /S /P /K [39] 306 0 obj << << /S /P >> /S /P /Type /StructElem 179 0 obj endobj /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 25 0 R >> << 244 0 R 245 0 R 246 0 R 247 0 R 248 0 R 249 0 R 250 0 R 251 0 R 252 0 R 253 0 R /S /P << /K [9] 36 0 obj 99 0 obj >> /S /P /StructParents 12 /Type /StructElem /Pg 26 0 R 305 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem /S /LBody 21 0 obj endobj >> /P 10 0 R /Pg 22 0 R >> endobj 0000005048 00000 n >> << /S /P /K [5] /Type /StructElem /A 455 0 R 304 0 obj << Notice of Removal in the United States District Courts At A Glance, Case Management Statement in the United States District CourtAt A Glance. /Parent 6 0 R 303 0 obj /P 477 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem endobj << >> >> /Type /StructElem In a thorough opinion that cited to and adopted reasoning from courts across the country, the Fourth District denied the plaintiffs petition for certiorari and upheld the trial courts order. 264 0 R 265 0 R 266 0 R 267 0 R 268 0 R 269 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R] 132 0 obj >> nn4L^>|p0#~o#|g<fOM?](O9b_hUIWKe2I37&$$8i=BNfOeopT,.N! /K [4] << /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] Form 2 - GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. << endobj 35 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R /K [33] /K [8] Blanket, unsupported objections that a discovery litany of objections, discussed below. /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] For a more detailed discussion of the invocation of privilege, see. endobj /S /P /K [2] /S /P << endobj x* /S /P >> 280 0 R 281 0 R 282 0 R 43 0 R] >> /Group 379 0 R endobj /Pg 15 0 R 48 0 obj /K [1] /A 467 0 R /Pg 34 0 R 14 0 obj >> /K [2] Specific objections should be matched to specific interrogatories. /P 472 0 R >> /Type /StructElem 29 0 obj 51 0 obj endobj >> /A 459 0 R << endobj A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. 192 0 obj /K [10] 298 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj << endobj >> 203 0 obj 301 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R endobj >> /S /P 2011) (holding that postings on a plaintiffs Facebook account, if relevant, are not precluded from discovery because the plaintiff utilized privacy settings); Tompkins v. Detroit Metro. /Group 344 0 R 0000051314 00000 n /S /P /K 28 /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 74 0 obj << /S /P endobj /P 10 0 R << /K [7] /Type /StructElem /S /P /Annots [] << /Pg 13 0 R 159 0 obj >> /S /P /StructParents 9 /Parent 6 0 R /Resources 368 0 R /S /P 15 [170 0 R 171 0 R 172 0 R 173 0 R 174 0 R 291 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R] 279 0 obj >> <>/Metadata 14 0 R/OutputIntents[<>]/Pages 8 0 R/StructTreeRoot 16 0 R/Type/Catalog/Names 71 0 R>> /P 10 0 R >> /S /P /P 10 0 R >> /S /P /Pg 34 0 R << 206 0 obj /Type /StructElem Standard objections to discovery requests under the FRCP and the Cal. >> %%EOF 175 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R endobj 3 [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 318 0 obj 67 0 obj >> >> Note that if an interrogatory asks for improper information and you fail to object, the court might treat your objection as "waived," or surrendered. >> /P 10 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /Pg 16 0 R << /P 10 0 R 303.1: Objection. /P 446 0 R /K [3] 107 0 R 108 0 R] 165 0 obj 0000177044 00000 n /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /Type /StructElem Not surprisingly, many plaintiffs now object to any discovery requests seeking social media information on grounds including overbreadth, vagueness and violation of the right to privacy. 73 0 obj /P 10 0 R /K [7] >> >> /P 476 0 R /Annots [] /K [3] 283 0 obj /K [37] >> 59 0 obj /K 25 >> /Pg 14 0 R /K [3] endobj << /S /L /P 10 0 R /P 472 0 R >> endobj 93 0 obj (For an example, see our sample interrogatory and answer number 14, below.) /K [39] 227 0 obj << >> /Tabs /S 7 [109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 286 0 R] 127 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7DD03834BE9A944CAF0E37776813323A><18B09DF8875632499EC042FF89B6BD03>]/Index[107 30]/Info 106 0 R/Length 97/Prev 120659/Root 108 0 R/Size 137/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream endobj /P 10 0 R /K [2] /P 472 0 R /Tabs /S /K [468 0 R] >> << 271 0 obj >> /Pg 14 0 R << 75 0 obj /Group 339 0 R >> 307 0 obj >> 4 0 obj /A 463 0 R /P 472 0 R >> endobj /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P The trial court ultimately compelled the plaintiff to produce, among other things, all photographs associated with the account for the two years prior to the incident to the present. /Type /StructElem endobj This Note addresses the duty to search for responsive information, who must respond to interrogatories, the types of responses that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure permit, and the service and filing requirements for interrogatories. /P 466 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P /Pg 31 0 R 0000177540 00000 n /S /P >> /K [1] endobj << /Type /StructElem << /Pg 14 0 R endobj << >> 186 0 obj endobj /P 10 0 R 146 0 obj /P 472 0 R << /Type /StructElem /K [2] /S /P endobj 25 0 obj 252 0 obj /Annots [] >> /S /P /K 12 198 0 obj endobj 138 0 obj /P 474 0 R /P 10 0 R /Resources 348 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem 193 0 obj /P 36 0 R /K [9] /S /P >> << Objections to portions of a document request do not excuse the responding party from producing those documents to which there is no objection. endobj /P 10 0 R >> 24 0 obj /K [0] /Pg 27 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj /Type /Page 0000177635 00000 n endobj >> 321 0 obj /ABCpdf 8123 /S /LBody endobj /StructParents 4 /Type /StructElem 107 0 obj endobj %PDF-1.7 << /K [2] /Annots [] /P 10 0 R /S /P 136 0 obj <>stream Co., 88 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. /Pg 13 0 R 3 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 25 0 R /Pg 29 0 R 11 0 obj << 0000000016 00000 n /S /LBody for the southern district of florida james tracy, ) ) plaintiff, ) ) case no. /Annots [434 0 R 435 0 R 436 0 R] /K [6] PDF SAMPLE DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS - Snider and Associates, LLC m8{3N? >> >> /S /P /Type /StructElem /Type /StructTreeRoot endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 448 0 R /K [30] 182 0 obj /S /P /K [1] endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R /Parent 6 0 R >> /P 10 0 R /S /LBody /S /P /K [10] << /K [8] endobj 291 0 obj << /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Annotation /Sect 450 0 R 451 0 R 452 0 R] A. Preparation and Interpretation of Requests for Documents 169 0 obj /K [456 0 R] /S /P 168 0 obj Prior to the plaintiffs deposition, defense counsel saw that her Facebook profile contained 1,285 photographs. 137 0 obj /S /P << endobj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 10 0 R 147 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem PDF Effective Use of Objections in Responding to Interrogatories 314 0 obj /S /P /K [8] >> endobj /Creator 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R *Joey is an associate in our Orlando, Florida office who can be reached at 407.505.4680 or jmchindamo@mdwcg.com. /K [284 0 R 285 0 R] P. 1.340 (a). d AoPP n L@`kd7U)hrA$~U20@/=J%e9ezCN c=@ 2S /Pg 31 0 R endobj << /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P /P 10 0 R /S /P >> 263 0 obj /K [2] /K [4] /K [3] /S /P /K [3] /P 10 0 R << Interrogatories requests that the responding party answer the questions under oath. /Pg 16 0 R /K [0] /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /S /P /K [1] /K [2] 0000052244 00000 n << /Pg 13 0 R << /S /Span 118 0 obj 255 0 obj 287 0 obj 0c$Q&18r1>O~M =(uS%#+6%P"s1VBddsMq8zBp9\T`Ucm2Ktei{1*["ev4R1fFE#c\OhC!q{e?q 0R'$ o(95 , requires the respondent to answer an interrogatory separately and fully in writing and under oath, unless the respondent objects, in which event the party objecting shall state with specificity the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent the interrogatory is not objectionable. /K [10] >> >> 109 0 obj /Type /StructElem 183 0 obj >> /Tabs /S /P 10 0 R 225 0 R 226 0 R 227 0 R 228 0 R 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R 233 0 R] 124 0 obj 0000175500 00000 n /Pg 22 0 R /Resources 338 0 R >> /K [29] 113 0 obj << << >> /Type /StructElem Defense Digestis prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. << Timothy J. Corrigan, Chief United States District Judge Elizabeth Warren, Clerk of Court. /S /P /K [7] /Pg 13 0 R /K [1] /P 10 0 R endobj >> 224 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R /S /P 233 0 obj endobj endobj /S /LBody /Type /StructElem 160 0 obj 5047 Rule 1.340 - INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.340 stream 43 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R /S /P /S /P /S /P /Type /StructElem /StructParents 10 /Pg 19 0 R /Type /Page >> /Type /StructElem /Annots [] /Type /Page << >> /P 10 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /S /P << 229 0 obj Plaintiff`s Responses And Objections To Defendant`s Second Request For /Pg 18 0 R >> << /S /P /P 471 0 R >> << /Pg 27 0 R endobj /K [1] /Pg 14 0 R 8 [115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R] /S /P The parties shall not make generalized, vague, or boilerplate objections. >> >> 83 0 obj 0000004751 00000 n >> /P 473 0 R << /K [11] /P 454 0 R <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>/ExtGState<>>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> 174 0 obj << 0000051645 00000 n endobj /Pg 13 0 R << << /Parent 6 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /Pg 18 0 R /P 445 0 R << /K [11] >> /S /P endobj >> /Pg 26 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj Each defendant's responses to these requests are essentially identical, with the exception of Interrogatory No. %PDF-1.4 % /Type /StructElem 300 0 obj >> /Resources 388 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /ParentTree 11 0 R /Group 404 0 R /Pg 33 0 R Rules Governing Interrogatories. << /S /P /Type /StructElem /K [3] endobj /Pg 26 0 R /K [2] x[[s~OUVj[THdwr9=aflnI$e%nZ|UQ>IC1$N* /Tabs /S << endobj 0000002727 00000 n /Type /StructElem << /K [6] /K [31] /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /Type /Page /Type /StructElem 56 0 obj >> /P 452 0 R /S /P << /Type /StructElem The authorities cited in this At A Glance Guide are current as of the publication date. trailer endobj /Type /Page /Pg 30 0 R /Type /StructElem >> endobj /K [4] /S /P /P 10 0 R endobj RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /Type /StructElem 319 0 obj 91 0 obj >> endobj /Annots [] << >> /Type /Page /K [0] 0 /P 10 0 R /Pg 20 0 R >> >> If the defendant has surveillance films or Facebook posts of your client and wants to use them as evidence, they must be disclosed AFTER the plaintiff's deposition. endobj Cal. /Type /StructElem /Lang (en-US) >> << 250 0 obj >> /Contents [325 0 R 326 0 R 327 0 R] 96 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem 284 0 R 285 0 R] /Type /StructElem /P 447 0 R $~)+Is2JdR3?RJc[1+@a 0000004919 00000 n Interrogatories: Responding to Interrogatories (FL) | Practical Law /S /P /S /P 185 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R << /Type /StructElem << << << /P 474 0 R >> /Annots [] /Type /StructElem /Type /Page /P 10 0 R /K [440 0 R 441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R 444 0 R 445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R 448 0 R 449 0 R /P 10 0 R >> /StructParents 16 /Pg 15 0 R >> endobj /P 10 0 R /S /P endobj endobj /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /K [10] 104 0 obj /K [6] << Arguments that a court should allow relevant and reasonably calculated photographs originating from a social media account, but not, say, text-based writings, are not only logically inconsistent with Nucci, but they are also internally inconsistent with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1), which allows [d]iscovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party.. PDF GENERAL ORDER ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND PROCEDURES - United States Courts >> /S /P /Type /StructElem /S /P << Answers made by a party are not binding on a co-party. 217 0 obj 264 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R /K [11] 158 0 obj /Pg 23 0 R << /Type /StructElem PDF MIDDLE DISTRICT DISCOVERY - United States Courts << 228 0 obj endobj 64 0 obj /K [21] 290 0 obj >> /S /P /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /S /P /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R endobj /K [1] /Type /StructElem notice of serving plaintiff's answers to defendant uff's second set of interrogatories directed to plaintiff /StructParents 6 /Type /StructElem 50 0 obj >> /P 10 0 R /K [20] endobj {x$K3*q|FC8.xw,96xt*"\'g&`=>-YS6} D1Wq{Z%RLDH1. /Type /StructElem endobj /K [12] endobj << /P 10 0 R /Group 419 0 R /P 10 0 R << endobj Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ia9defb5505ba11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-Responding-to-Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default), Interrogatories: Responding to Interrogatories (FL). 24, No. /Type /StructElem 10 [126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R] /Length 484 0 R Seeking certiorari relief, the plaintiff sought to quash the trial courts order compelling production of the photographs, arguing the order violated her right to privacy. 18 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Pg 15 0 R 55 0 obj This Interrogatory duplicative and overly burdensome, and harassing. /S /P /Pg 26 0 R endobj 58 0 obj<> endobj If an interrogatory seeks information that is not within the personal knowledge of the responding party, that party must provide any information that it has and the source on which the information is based. Fla. R. Civ. /StructParents 15 /K [14] 1 [270 0 R 271 0 R 272 0 R 273 0 R 274 0 R 275 0 R 276 0 R 277 0 R 278 0 R 279 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Pg 33 0 R >> << endobj << By making the accompanying responses and objections to Defendant's requests for documents and interrogatory, Plaintiff does not waive, and hereby expressly reserves, its right to assert any and all objections as to the admissibility of such responses into evidence in this action, or in any other proceedings, on any and all grounds including, but /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /K [4] /P 10 0 R %PDF-1.6 % 6 0 obj /Pg 24 0 R 78 0 obj Fla. R. Civ. 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /S /P endobj 0000002210 00000 n Interrogatories can be served on a plaintiff any time after the action is commenced. >> >> << /P 468 0 R <]>> 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R /Type /StructElem /S /P 136 0 obj 266 0 obj /Pg 25 0 R /K [1] /Type /StructElem 125 0 obj /StructTreeRoot 3 0 R Interrogatories | Newsome Law endobj << /StructParents 1 /Type /StructElem hWmo6:87q8`7 {m.hy+KDfHI](. 220 0 obj << /Type /StructElem xref /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 22 0 R endobj endstream endobj 59 0 obj<> endobj 61 0 obj<> endobj 62 0 obj<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 63 0 obj<> endobj 64 0 obj<> endobj 65 0 obj<> endobj 66 0 obj[/ICCBased 71 0 R] endobj 67 0 obj<> endobj 68 0 obj<> endobj 69 0 obj<> endobj 70 0 obj<>stream A sample set of interrogatories that may be used in a Florida circuit court civil case. << /Contents [350 0 R 351 0 R 352 0 R] /P 10 0 R /K [4] 16 [178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 292 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R >> /P 475 0 R /K [9] /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem << >> /K [24] 145 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R /K [35] 0000052748 00000 n endstream /S /P /P 10 0 R /S /P 322 0 obj endobj /S /P << /K [18] << endobj >> /K [15] /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R 33 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /StructParents 17 /S /P /Parent 6 0 R >> endobj 239 0 obj 110 0 obj /K [5] /Type /StructElem 245 0 obj /K [3] /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem PDF United States District Court Middle District of Florida Orlando endobj 284 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem >> >> /S /P << /K [9] >> >> /S /P /K [14] /Pg 27 0 R endobj /P 476 0 R 387 (E.D. /Type /StructElem 161 0 obj endobj /K [22] endobj >> /Pg 16 0 R /Type /Page << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [34] << /InlineShape /Sect endobj /Pg 31 0 R 270 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> /Type /StructElem hb```FB ea8$$zPi@ &+on;00\?L\`h`h`16k@@0*33d1L5\ "uZ#&4l << 117 0 obj << 218 0 obj /P 472 0 R << endobj trailer << >> /Type /StructElem >> << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem P. 1.280(e). /K [1] /P 10 0 R 299 0 obj >> /P 10 0 R /K [6] /P 10 0 R /ModDate (D:20190506133758-04'00') /Annots [] endobj << >> P. 1.340(c). /Type /StructElem /Pg 19 0 R /Contents [400 0 R 401 0 R 402 0 R] endobj /P 478 0 R /S /P /Producer /Type /StructElem 134 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R >> /S /P To maximize the likelihood of obtaining requested social media evidence, carefully craft interrogatories and requests for production to encompass relevant and reasonably calculated materials. >> /K [13] P. 1.340(b). endobj >> << << /S /P /S /P In litigation, written discovery typically consists of (1) Requests for Production, (2) Requests for Admission, and (3) Interrogatories. /Pg 18 0 R /Type /Page /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> 112 0 obj /S /P C. Other Interrogatory Issues | Middle District of Florida | United /Group 369 0 R <> >> /K [5] << 13 0 obj >> endobj endobj endobj 139 0 obj /P 476 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /S /P /Pg 27 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [22] /K [15] /K [8] endobj MOTIONS TO COMPEL, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, OR TO QUASH. << /P 10 0 R This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. /P 10 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] << << endobj /Pg 21 0 R /K [33] >> /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /S /P /Pg 25 0 R /Contents [340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R] endstream endobj startxref /Type /StructElem M i c r o s o f t W o r d 2 0 1 6; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT INTERROGATORY RESPONSES. /P 473 0 R endobj >> /P 10 0 R endobj >> /K [11] >> >> RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. /P 10 0 R Interrogatories, Requests for Productions, and Admissions /K [4] << >> 4 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> endobj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 10 0 R endobj >> /Footer /Sect stream /S /Table << /K [25] << /S /P endobj >> /Pg 32 0 R /S /LBody /K [11] << >> /Type /StructElem But if are a plaintiff's lawyer, you must know this rule. Combatting Stonewalling | General Objection | NewsomeLaw.com << << /S /P 282 0 obj 6 [97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 33 0 R >> /Type /StructElem >> << << /S /P /Type /Pages /Contents [365 0 R 366 0 R 367 0 R] /Group 364 0 R /Resources 358 0 R /P 472 0 R It is duplicative of Form Interrogatory 3.1 which was served by Madera Framing on November 24, 2015 and responded to on January 15, 2016, by Responding Party. >> /K [12] /Type /Page /K [0] /S /P See Patterson v. Turner Constr. /Pg 34 0 R 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R] /Pg 34 0 R << 24, No. /StructParents 21 /K [1] endobj >> /S /LBody << 671 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[]/Index[655 32]/Info 654 0 R/Length 81/Prev 387279/Root 656 0 R/Size 687/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream /P 473 0 R /Pg 15 0 R >> /S /P endobj 098595 Attorneys Ad Litem for the minor Offices at Grand Bay Plaza 2665 Bayshore Drive Suite 220-14 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: 305-373-3101 Facsimile: 305-381-8734 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via 111 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Marked true P. 1.340(b). 121 0 obj /P 472 0 R endobj H|= /S /P /K [36] /Pg 34 0 R /Resources 418 0 R 39 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem << /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem >> 76 0 obj /K [6] endobj /K [0] endobj /K [5] >> endobj 190 0 obj /S /P /S /P endobj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] 0000000914 00000 n /Pg 34 0 R P. 1.340(b). >> /P 476 0 R /Pg 29 0 R 45 0 obj /P 472 0 R /StructParents 19 endobj >> /P 10 0 R /Pg 28 0 R >> endobj /K [5] /Pg 19 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R << /Type /StructElem << >> /Pg 19 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /K [0] /Pg 30 0 R /S /LBody <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 21 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] P. 1.340 (a). /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem >> 309 0 obj /P 10 0 R

Mycigna Is Temporarily Unavailable, Silbert's Bungalow Colony, Articles S

sample objections to interrogatories florida