There is no agreement about what Bokeh means. You will get perfectly round star images if you use an aperture stop in front of the lens made of a series of filter thread step-down rings. The flat lens hood is great for taking flat frames after a night of astrophotography. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. - in my subjects' skin. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed August 12th, 2009 To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). Canon 60Da DSLR and Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L2 lens at 135mm, f/3.2. Both the 135 and 200mm Canon l lenses are winners IMHO. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count.So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. While they provide a very large flat field we noticed some CA. They just wanted to increase their joy from photography. I used this lens quite a bit years ago as my main working lens. Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. Without the blurb I would have taken it as a 24 hour news studio shot with back projection or a cut and paste layer.The other stuff is really nice though. Lots of older lenses no longer satisfy. Not too heavy. But you just know that there is the professionalism that is lacking here -- and the writer's Instagram page confirms that. "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbrigham/284303834/. Well saturated but neutral. Also Nikon DC 135mm f/2 is a great lens, a little better than 135mm Canon 200mm Astrobin photos (not taken by me): https://www.astrobin.m USM F2.8 L II It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. Add To Cart. By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. Often need f2.2 to f2.8 to gain sufficient DOF for human subjects. So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. The inset picture is a magnified view of the bottom right corner of the frame. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. First of all, the background separation and the bokeh: I had photographed lots of animals in bushes before, but never before had I seen the bush melt away in the way it did with the 135mm lens. Must have if you're serious about portraits. On a full frame body, I rely upon this lens and it does not disappoint. Amazing colours, contrast, bokeh, everything! If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. For those of you that like to pixel-peep, have a look at the single image frame captured using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! Beware others critical comments here about how flat these images look, the author has chosen specific topics and viewpoints to highlight f2 with this lens, so see the wow review for what it is please and the negative comments need placing in context. Which is the better buy? I have an old 135/2.5 Takumar that is not bad at all, for the price. RATING. Build quality: excellent. $399 00. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. I seems many people he are confused about the meaning of the word. Some reviewers have listed lack of IS as a "Con". Oh and it's stabilised. I am not really looking at buying anything else, though. 135 mm. Also, when used as recommended, and properly guided at full camera resolution, they are all comparable to a field-corrected APO, producing perfect images from edge to edge which can be easily cropped 25% with no evidence of aberrations. 645 lenses such as the mamiya apo line and pentax edif can operate within these conditions without vignetting on apsc sensors. When you shoot a 135mm F2 lens at F2, your subject will stand out in this beautiful way, often without much work needed from you as the photographer. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. From far to near, the AF is instantaneous. Bye Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. Anyone use the Samyang 135mm for astrophotography? It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? Camera tech for video has come a long way in recent years, with faster autofocus, subject tracking, eye tracking and smarter lenses that stabilize the frame. So so far the best that I have used are the 200f2.8L and the 400f5.6L. Along with improvements in telescope mounts, camera technology, filters, and digital image processing, these have allowed amateurs to produce astrophotographs of nearly professional quality. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! No rubber sealing against the camera body tend to give me the creeps when shooting in the wet. Are you really using 135 a lot? Yes, it is about the same as 85mm f/1.4 blur factor is 60mm, while 135mm f/2 blur factor is 67mm. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. IS is useful in my f/4 zooms but I don't need it to hand-hold this lens. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. For that I would investigate alternatives just to make sure. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. If so, which one? Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. Let's the games begin! The lens arrived next day, less than 24 hours after I hit the order button. At under 900USD, it's a steal. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. Is there a reason why a 135/2.8 or even 135/4 would provide significantly different images? I think they are an outstanding value for any wide-field astrophotographer, and are particularly suitable for newcomers. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. It's a technical review about a couple of lens attributes. Some noteworthy targets to try. Also type the lens you are interested in into the search window on Astrobin to see examples shot with that lens. (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej I do not use burst mode, but the lens would produce movie-like frames. Your Baader filter passes 420-680nm and, in theory, a good APO should be able to focus that part of the spectrum with no chromatic aberration. Jordan has a simple fix camera manufacturers could implement to improve their video autofocus. Large focus ring. Neutral yet very nice colours. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . As you know, camera lenses come in varying focal lengths, apertures, and optical quality. (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). Available Monday. But for many of us, somewhere in between, are plenty of short to mid-tele lenses that will deliver solid service (in terms of subject separation) without carrying around still another kilo for the sake of more blur. I used Canon's 135 f/2 for ten years. But, since fast 300mm ED lenses are beyond my toy budget, I would appreciate seeing magnified center and corner test images of actual star fields. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 4th, 2006 You won't get the excessive background blurr -- which for the beginning photographer may actually be a good thing. 135mm and 200mm lenses are suitable for wide angle star-field views, and comet and asteroid hunting, while 300mm lenses serve very well for the Andromeda galaxy, large emission nebulae, open clusters, and even larger globular clusters. We were very impressed with X-T5's 40-megapixel APS-C sensor, check out some full resolution images! So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. Holiday Savings $50 . Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. Would it at all be possible to at least make sure the people you publish know a little bit about photography? Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens Review - The-Digital-Picture.com I got my first 400 around 50 years ago, and I must say that each step forward feels like a revolution, for a while. I see that many commenters did not get what this lens can do. enlarge. This is one of my all time favourites. If You can afford it, buy it! Not another article that promotes portraits shot with wide open lens and out of focus highlights in the background. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. I found this highly restrictive for shooting indoors where there was seldom enough distance between me with my camera and my subject(s). See the full-size version on Astrobin. Well, for me. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. The Rokinon website lists this lens as being useful for portraiture photography, and most telephoto applications. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. Latter looks quite professional.. When i just judge by the indicator line as i click through, it seems like its 19 that gets skipped wondering if there is anything more definite? D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. Thanks Gary! The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? Exposure uniformity (vignetting) is also really excellent, reaching a maximum of 1/4 EV (on a camera with an APS-C size sensor) at f/2, and dropping to well under 1/10 EV at f/2.8 and above. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. I found with the 70-200 made me lazy. 45 minutes. I use it to photograph highschool basketball in poor light. I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. Really, just an amazing lens, easily worth the $800-900 it commands on the street. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. Stick to Andromeda, and skip the Whirlpool. We revisit a classic DPReviewTV episode in which Chris Niccolls and Jordan Drake shoot a few rolls of Fujifilm's Acros 100 II, and a few frames on the X-T3 in Acros film simulation, to find out. CAs: a little in the OOF area - not disturbing anyway. I just wish this lens had IS for low light and portraits with flash. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). 6 Reasons I Love the Canon 135mm f/2 Lens - YouTube Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens for Canon SLR Cameras - Amazon.com I use the word design, because although the available 135mm F2 lenses aren't the exact same optical formula, they share many important traits. The reason the 135mm lens was that it was the longest lens that would focus with a Leica rangefinder. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. FULL FRAME TELEPHOTO 135mm F2.0 The Japanese word "bokeh" can be translated into English as "blur". All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Nothing else like it and the reason the two DC lenses have remained in production since they were introduced in 1993. https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/1180017085/photos/3721717/bokeh. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. I enjoied the use of this lens many years before the DSLR. The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. $218.00 for 7 days. I should mention that I have only tested this full-frame lens using my astrophotography DSLRs, all of which are crop-sensor camera bodies.

Are Cancers Jealous Friends, Mass Murders In North Dakota, Where Did Anthony Bourdain Go In Vienna?, Articles C